您现在的位置是:半岛新闻网 > 产品中心
It’s shocking that Jeff Sessions recused himself from the Russia investigation.
半岛新闻网2024-09-22 10:06:04【产品中心】3人已围观
简介In an interview with the New York Timeson Wednesday, Donald Trump said Jeff Sessions’ decision to re
In an interview with the New York Timeson Wednesday, Donald Trump said Jeff Sessions’ decision to recuse himself from the Russia investigation had been a grave miscalculation that had effectively disqualified him from serving as attorney general. “Sessions should have never recused himself, and if he was going to recuse himself, he should have told me before he took the job, and I would have picked somebody else,” Trump told Peter Baker, Michael S. Schmidt, and Maggie Haberman.
It sounds ridiculous. Of course Sessions had to recuse himself: As a top adviser to the Trump campaign, he could never be objective or unbiased in supervising an FBI investigation into that same campaign’s possible collusion with the Russian government. Especially in light of the Washington Post report that Sessions had met with a Russian official during his tenure as a Trump surrogate and then told Congress that he hadn’t, the recusal was a no-brainer.
But Trump was right to be shocked when Sessions willingly stepped aside. Though it may have seemed like a no-brainer at the time, the fact that Sessions did the right thing stands, in retrospect, as the biggest surprise of the Trump era so far and one of the only instances in which this administration has lived up to a typical standard of government ethics.
Simply put, Sessions could have just not recused. What was going to happen if he didn’t? Who in the administration was going to stand up and tell the attorney general that even the appearance of a potential conflict of interest is a very, very bad thing? Who was going to say publicly that staying on would violate official Department of Justice regulations, other than the usual Democratic goo-goos in the House and Senate and the self-righteous dorks in the fake news media?
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementIn the March 2 press conference in which he announced his recusal, Sessions explained that he’d consulted with senior DOJ officials before making his decision. “I asked for their candid and honest opinion about what I should do about investigations, certain investigations, and my staff recommended recusal,” he said. “They said that since I had involvement with the campaign, I should not be involved in any campaign investigation. I have studied the rules and considered their comments and evaluation. I believe those recommendations are right and just.”
In the before times, when presidential administrations behaved like presidential administrations, an attorney general’s willingness to listen to career staff on a matter of black-and-white institutional ethics wouldn’t have seemed extraordinary. Now it does, because with Trump as president, the notion that politics is governed by unchangeable laws of gravity has been exposed as a collective delusion. Under the new rules, Sessions could have remained in charge of the investigation even though he clearly shouldn’t have. Granted, it would have been impossible to justify such a decision in a rational, principled way. So what?
AdvertisementCall it nihilism if you want, but remember that Trump faced no consequential criticism from the GOP when he fired James Comey as FBI director and admitted in a television interview that he was thinking about Russia when he did it. Remember also that with the exception of this one act, Sessions’ tenure as attorney general has been marked by boundless loyalty to Trump and one broken DOJ norm after another. Against that backdrop, the recusal really does look like a very costly unforced error—one that led directly to the empowerment of stubborn institutionalists Rod Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general, and Robert Mueller, the special counsel now in charge of the Russia investigation.
Advertisement AdvertisementSure, there would have been calls from Democrats for Sessions to resign. If the attorney general takes seriously his duty to protect the integrity and independence of the Justice Department, he has no choice but to step aside, they would have said, probably on Twitter.Sure, career attorneys at DOJ might have raised a stink if he defied their recommendation. According to three people with knowledge of internal Justice Department discussions, attorneys consulted on the recusal question are reeling after an extraordinary rebuke by Sessions, a newspaper would have reported, probably on its front page.
Maybe it would have been slightly unpleasant for Sessions to tune out that static. More likely, it would have been easy, especially compared with the grief he’s taking now from the guy in the Oval Office who actually has the power to fire him. All Sessions had to do was nothing. Looking back, it would have been just one more act of defiance the political establishment and the public would’ve been forced to accept.
Tweet Share Share Comment很赞哦!(4)
相关文章
- CPUs Don't Matter For 4K Gaming... Wrong!
- Thermoelectric generator contrasts heat of Sun and cold of space
- Berrettini enters ATP Finals courtesy Shapovalov
- DoorDash nudges users who don't leave tips
- Against All Odds: How Netflix Made It
- Lifetime of lithium
- 养猪为何成了饲料企业的利润黑洞?
- This new bot attempts to give you raw, unfiltered Trump
- 2016's $400 GPU vs. 2019's $400 GPUs
- 跨越山海 共赴征程
热门文章
站长推荐
Number Representations in Computer Hardware
冬至过了 平安夜来了 天气冷了 市场热了
最震撼景观 是每一处细节的完美 东科·原山墅 做到了
Chairman of the RNC still learning how to use a gavel
3D Game Rendering 101
A bunch of truly annoyed cats (and one sad chug) looking sharp on Dress Up Your Pet Day
立足灾后恢复重建 布局科学长远发展
Oprah's Golden Globes speech is the newest addition to Spotify's MLK Jr. playlist